"CMG was great at counseling me and giving me all the options before we settled. I was pleased that Gene and Paul always included me in the decisionmaking process and were responsive to me. As stressful as it was, this was a great experience for me and an education in the law."
-Kent Klingman
Kent, WA

Cases We Handle

Misreading a Mammogram

At age 44, Molly was conscientious about getting mammograms, so she was shocked when during a routine screening mammogram a small lump was detected and a later biopsy revealed breast cancer. As her husband Mike was transporting her medical records from one physician's office to another, he found an old report from Molly's mammogram at age 41 stating that the calcifications in her right breast had increased since her mammogram at age 37 and recommending another mammogram at age 42. She had been told that this mammogram was normal. Molly had a mastectomy and lymph node removal, which revealed cancer in 21 out of her 22 lymph nodes. She underwent six months of weekly chemotherapy and two months of high-dose chemotherapy. But as a result of the negligent delay in her diagnosis, Molly's chance of surviving breast cancer more than five years fell from 95 to 25 percent.

We filed a claim on behalf of Molly, her husband, and two teenaged children against the radiologist who misread the mammogram and the imaging center that employed him. We retained as experts two radiologists, who found the defendant radiologist had failed to report evidence of cancer present on the age 41 mammogram; three medical oncologists, including one who treats only patients with breast cancer; and a physician who studies breast cancer screening and survival rates. We were able to negotiate a substantial settlement, which funded Molly's treatment and nursing care and compensated Mike for the loss of his wife and her children for the loss of their mother.

© Chemnick Moen Greenstreet